🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.